Evan E. Richards

The Cinematography of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” (2011)

evanerichards — Fri, 11 May 2012 02:17:28 +0000

The Cinematography of “The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo” (2011)
Cinematographer: Jeff Cronenweth
Nominated for the 2012 Academy Award for Best Cinematography

The Cinematography of “War Horse” (2011)

evanerichards — Sat, 14 Apr 2012 05:53:02 +0000

The Cinematography of “War Horse” (2011)
Cinematographer: Janusz Kaminski
Nominated for the 2011 Academy Award for Best Cinematography

The Cinematography of “Hugo” (2011)

evanerichards — Thu, 12 Apr 2012 12:45:53 +0000

The Cinematography of “Hugo” (2011)
Cinematographer: Robert Richardson
Won the 2012 Academy Award for Best Cinematography

The Cinematography of “Glory” (1989)

evanerichards — Sat, 07 Apr 2012 18:30:28 +0000

The Cinematography of “Glory” (1989)
Cinematographer: Freddie Francis
Won the 1990 Academy Award for Best Cinematography

The Cinematography of “The Road” (2009)

evanerichards — Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:03:06 +0000

The Cinematography of “The Road” (2009)
Cinematographer: Javier Aguirresarobe
Nominated for a 2010 BAFTA for Best Cinematography

The Cinematography of “Goodfellas” (1990)

evanerichards — Sun, 04 Mar 2012 16:26:25 +0000

The Cinematography of “Goodfellas” (1990)
Cinematographer: Michael Bauhaus
Nominated for the British Society of Cinematographers award for Best Cinematography

The Cinematography of “The Company Men” (2010)

evanerichards — Mon, 20 Feb 2012 03:34:02 +0000

The Cinematography of “The Company Men”
Cinematographer: Roger Deakins

It’s one thing to shoot compelling images when you are filming a war scene with smoke and explosions and tanks and dirty faces. Or a sweeping vista of Monument Valley with rugged frontiersmen on horses. Its another thing altogether to shoot a good looking scene in a middle class home. You have very little to work with. You have to make something look good/natural that you’ve probably seen every single day of your life. Deakins did a fine job with this film and I think it deserves to be studied. Enjoy.

An Interview with Mark Vargo, ASC

evanerichards — Thu, 02 Feb 2012 18:47:10 +0000

I recently had the very exciting opportunity to speak with Mark Vargo, ASC. Mark has worked on some of the most iconic films in the history of cinema like Star Wars, Raiders of the Lost Ark and Ghostbusters (for which he was nominated for an Academy award in 1985). He graciously shared his thoughts on film vs. digital, his experience shooting “The Way Back” and where technology might be headed in the not-to-distant future. Special thanks to Mark for taking the time to chat with me. Here’s what he had to say.

You started out in visual effects work didn’t you?
I did. That seems like quite a long time ago but yes I did. My first film credit was “Empire Strikes Back” and that was a very seminal experience for me. When I was up for a professorship at a film school they said, “Well you don’t have a terminal degree” and I sort of laughed to myself and said, “Yeah, I guess I don’t have a terminal degree because I was busy making “Raiders of the Lost Ark” and “Empire Strikes Back” and “Dragonslayer” and “ET”.” I’m not exactly sure where those forces meet. But at least I’m an adjunct professor now.

My path is sort of backwards from yours. I started out doing more cinematography and now I’m in Boston working as a VFX artist. But you started in VFX and now you’re a DP. What made you move from VFX into doing more shooting?
Well, I wanted to be closer to the story. I didn’t want to be a bricklayer anymore. And believe me I’ve laid tons of brick. And I just like to shoot! I love animating peoples material and I did that until I was 30 years old and then I thought now I want to generate that material that someone else can deal with. And I think we accomplished that very successfully on “Rise of the Planet of the Apes”. So it’s still with me even after all these years. I’m still shooting plates for certain people and shooting action scenes for other people. I’ve seen it from photochemical to “now lets put down some tracking marks and then we can put this figure in the geometry of this set and just do whatever we want”. I can’t believe in my short lifespan I’ve gone from black and white mattes to digital composites that you can hardly even believe. And I’ve seen more then Georges Méliès saw from 1898 to 1940 by a factor of 10 or so at least.

It definitely has changed drastically just in the last 10 years. Do you have any sense where the next big breakthrough might be and where things might be headed?
Well, my sense is that it’s going to go to a virtual experience which I don’t want. I think we already live in a virtual world as people. I like two dimensional photography. I think everyone needs to take a break and sit down and watch something that isn’t exactly like their life experience. But theres no question in my mind that it’ll be 3d. And we’ll never escape anything .You won’t feel like it’s a cool thing to get on a train for an overnighter from Vancouver to Banff. And that really bothers me.

In becoming a DP did you teach yourself or did you go to school for it?
It was all self learned on the road. I didn’t go to school to be a DP. I wish I knew of a school like that. I’ll tell you one thing. The class that I just taught and the one I hope to teach next fall, if I had these sophomore that I had this year for another four or five months, they could actually graduate and shoot a feature film. Its just great! They’re really hungry. I gave them 15 years of experience in 15 weeks.

Lets talk about “The Way Back” I was very excited about the movie since I read the book. Prisoner of War escapes are a big interest of mine.
I know! I read the book too. I actually taught cinematography at Montana State University this semester and I told my students a third of the book is on this train where people are standing shoulder to shoulder naked, shivering, dying, vomiting for more than fifteen hundred miles from Poland to Siberia and Peter Weir picked it up when he should have. At the camp. And I get that.

How many countries did you shoot in?
Lets see. Bulgaria, on the edge of Greece and the Greek Alps for the Siberia shots, Morocco and I think we nibbled at the border of Algeria and then India.

Its probably getting harder today to shoot these pristine untouched landscapes. Did you have any shots where you had to digitally remove any radio towers or distractions?
No. Not where we were. Not that I’m aware of. I mean we were conscious of contrails but everything I shot was absolutely pristine. In the world its still possible to do that. I’ve shot in New Mexico and Arizona and the deserts of California where it’s amazing. As many people as there are on the planet you can still find a shot.

How involved was Peter Weir with your shooting?
Well if he wasn’t there in person we had a strong sense of what he was looking for. He’s more of an actor/story guy. He doesn’t even have an email address. And he will know. He was there every day and its like its cool or its brown or its sepia or its whatever and thats what he wants from us as cinematographers. It’s the most honest filmmaking you’ll ever be a part of. There is nothing artificial about it. Its like, this is where it was, this is how hot it is, this is the color that we’re seeing today. And he doesn’t shoot digitally. This is a movie we shot on film.

But you shot your latest film “Ted” digitally. Do you approach shooting digital differently?
Yeah, I did unfortunately. Its hard to take it as seriously. When there is a movie camera on the set people say, “Oh we’re shooting film this is much more serious”. It’s the difference between the district court and the supreme court basically. Because you actually have to take light readings and go with an exposure unlike digital where you’ll look at a histogram and say well thats ok we can deal with it later. Film is an immediate thing. For instance did you ever have a film camera? When you blew your exposure it was irretrievable wasn’t it. That’s the difference.

How much of “The Way Back” was storyboarded?
I don’t think hardly any of it was. We didn’t know the locations. No, we didn’t work from storyboards. At all. We get the location photos, then we’d tech scout it and get the angles. I can’t even remember seeing one storyboard from “The Way Back”. He might have storyboarded “The Truman Show” quite a bit because it was mostly on stage and then they probably storyboarded the storm sequences on Master and Commander just for budgeting and accounting reasons, but a movie like “The Way Back” is sort of like a bowl of mercury of a film with the actors. It was an ensemble piece from the get go. And the story told and the earnestness of the performances outweighed where we were looking . So it was up to Russell Boyd and I where we could shoot and Peter was good with all of it. A very different movie. Not your normal movie. “The Way Back” was really just a documentary.

How much grading was done on “The Way Back”?
There is not much grading there. That was the color that was available to us. Thats not forced in any way. That was because Russell and I are very natural photographers not just still guys but movie guys, that’s the color we shot.

What advice would you give to a cinematographer starting out?
Find what you really want to do. I’d be a far more accomplished cinematographer at my age if I hadn’t spent 10 years in visual effects. Although I feel like I’ve made up a lot of ground. But you’re feeling your way through it. You’re seeing shots that work, you’re seeing shots that don’t work. And the day that you become frustrated and think, “I can’t work on this anymore” then you have to think, “Well whats the next step?”. And if you want to be a DP or a director or a writer or a post production supervisor thats all up to you. So my advice is check out state websites, film commissions like Louisiana and New Mexico all these places where you can get a job on a set, on a movie immediately without having union regulations. because inevitably the hottest states that are making movies are “right to work” states and then start out at whatever capacity you can schmooze you way into whether it’s a PA or production or a camera intern, or whatever. But you don’t have to be in LA and do the west coast thing the way you used to. That was a baptism of fire for me. I did it for 20 years and now I’m not there anymore but I do know the value of that. But its also important to know that it’s ok not to have had that experience to be a successful filmmaker. I know everyone thinks you’re not really a practicing muslim until you’ve gone to Mecca. In the film business thats not true anymore. So don’t feel like you’re missing out on anything. You might get just spend five grand to get there and learn it isn’t for you. I like to demystify that.

2012 Academy Award Nominees for Best Cinematography

evanerichards — Wed, 01 Feb 2012 16:48:38 +0000

The 2012 Academy Award Nominees for Best Cinematography

Tree of Life

There is no way “The Tree of Life” wasn’t going to get nominated. Its just stunning. It makes me feel guilty just looking at the images. They are so perfect. Incandescent. I’m guessing Emmanuel Lubezki will win for this one. Its about time too. He’s been nominated 4 times before for “A Little Princess”, “Sleepy Hollow”, “The New World” (another Terrence Malick collaboration) and “Children of Men”. It’s also no surprise that a Terrence Malick movie got nominated for best cinematography. With the exception of “Badlands”, every one of his films has received a nomination or a win for Best Cinematography.

War Horse

I’ve always enjoyed Spielbergs movies and I liked “War Horse” very much. I’m always a sucker for the gritty aesthetic of war movies and post apocalyptic movies and I thought this one was beautiful. It had a very different look to it that I couldn’t quite put my finger on. More front lighting perhaps? It reminded me of the way older live-action disney movies used to look. It certainly had a distinctive feel to it.

The Artist

I can’t really judge this one as I haven’t had a chance to see it yet. From the trailer thought it looks great. I love how they matched the look of older films by having a 1.37 aspect ratio and a low contrast B&W image. I’m excited to see this. Hopefully I can check it out soon.

Hugo

Hugo might have a chance of edging out “Tree of Life”. This is Robert Richardson’s seventh academy award nomination. He was also nominated for “Platoon”, “Born on the Fourth of July”, “JFK”, “Snow Falling on Cedars”, “The Aviator” and “Inglourious Basterds”. It’s a 3D film but that didn’t seem to hurt “Avatar” which won in 2010. It marks a lot of firsts for Martin Scorsese. First 3D film, first children’s movie, first use of extensive visual effects sequences and I believe it was also the first time he shot a film digitally. Looks like someone’s starting to embrace the new technology

The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo

This one was a foregone conclusion to get nominated. Fincher has a keen eye. His two previous films “The Social Network” and “Benjamin Button” were nominated for best cinematography too. So its no big surprise. It was shot by Jeff Cronenweth who you might not be aware is the son of Jordon Cronenweth who shot “Blade Runner”. Talented family.

There weren’t a lot of surprises in the Best Cinematography Category. With the exception of “The Artist” I guessed all of the nominated films before they were announced. A couple films that might have gotten nominations though…

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy

A good looking film. Shot by Hoyte Van Hoytema who also shot “Let the Right One In”. Not a flashy movie for cinematography the way Hugo or War Horse were, but still a very well shot movie.

Melancholia

Haven’t seen this one yet either, but the trailer looks gorgeous. I need to catch this one soon.

Drive

I loved this movie. Excellent pacing, acting, direction and cinematography. There were a couple of shots in the car where Ryan Gosling is driving in the dark The car is almost completely black but you can see his eyes shining our of almost complete darkness. Those shots were stunning. Great use of cinematography to help set the mood.

Reverse Key Lighting

evanerichards — Mon, 23 Jan 2012 04:10:35 +0000

I used to work with a cinematographer named Rob Draper (Halloween 5, The Spitfire Grill). He was having me practice one day by shooting a product shot for a whisky bottle. I had set the bottle up in front of a seamless backdrop and put a light in front of the bottle at about a 45 degree angle. Rob came in to see how I was doing. His first comment was “What made you put the light in front of the bottle rather than behind the bottle?” I hadn’t really thought much about it. “Why wouldn’t you put the light behind the bottle and bounce in a little light for fill on the front side?” he asked. And that was when I was first introduced to “Reverse Key Lighting”.

Reverse Key Lighting is also called “short lighting” or “narrow lighting”. The idea is that the key light is placed behind the subject rather than in front (the way you would probably see it set up in most cinematography books). In the world of news and interviews its sometimes called a “reporter sandwich” because of the way the reporter is sandwiched by the light behind him and the camera in front of him. Its a very versatile technique so lets take a look at some examples.

Reverse Key Lighting can be used in closeups

And in wider shots

Outdoors

Indoors

It can be used in animation

In a two shot

With a lot of fill light

Or very little fill light

One of the strengths of reverse key lighting is the way the shadows falloff across the face. When the key light is coming from the front it makes for very flat lighting. Its not dynamic and you don’t see a lot of shadows.

When you place the key light on the other side though, the light rakes across the face and you can see the light falling off into shadow on the side of the face closest to the camera. This make for much more compelling lighting and the gradient of the light falloff gives the subject a much more three-dimensional appearance.

In addition to being more visually interesting, reverse key lighting offers some other benefits. Because a smaller area of the face is lit it gives the illusion of a thinner face or body so it can be a very flattering way to light women. It can be flattering for men too, but sometimes you might want to give them a front key light to make them look more rugged or masculine. Reverse key lighting can also be a preferable way to light people with glasses as you don’t get any distracting reflections.

The important thing to remember about any lighting is that it should always serve the story. So don’t force any kind of lighting scenario onto a scene if it doesn’t fit the story or mood you’re trying to create.

Next time you are watching a movie shot by a great cinematographer keep yours eyes open for reverse key lighting. I think you’ll see it popping up a lot.